PasswordMaker 1.5.1 beta2 for Frfx/Moz/Netscp/Flock

[Eric H. Jung]

Hi,

PasswordMaker for Firefox/Mozilla/Netscape/Flock version 1.5.1 beta 2 has been released and is available here. I look forward to your feedback.

Thanks,
Eric

[major4579]

That fixed the problem with the Custom fields not being auto-populated. PMW 1.5.1.b2 is working fine so far, I will need to "exercise it" over the next couple of days and let you know what I find.

Thanks!

[Eric H. Jung]

Thanks. I look forward to hearing from you so I can get this out the door and start working on new features instead of bug fixing!

[Eric H. Jung]

Oops. I hadn't updated the About box to read "1.5.1 Beta2". It's fixed now. If you downloaded beta2 before now, the About box incorrectly reads "1.5.1 Beta1".

[major4579]

Eric,

I've tried accessing most of my frequently used sites and almost everything is working fine with PWM 1.5.1.b2.

In fact here is the only problem/quirk that I've encountered.

whether or not the Automaticaly populate option is checked on the General TAB, any custom fields from the "Auto-Populate" tab are entered.

This really doesn't affect my usage, just seems that the "Auto-Populate" fileds need a "Automatically Populate" option.

The other problem is with drag and drop to re-order the account list. I drag an account within a group and no matter where I drop it, it ends up as the last account in the group list.

[Eric H. Jung]

Thanks. 1.5.1 was submitted to AMO this morning.

whether or not the Automaticaly populate option is checked on the General TAB, any custom fields from the "Auto-Populate" tab are entered.

Yeah, this was the way I designed it.

This really doesn't affect my usage, just seems that the "Auto-Populate" fileds need a "Automatically Populate" option.

Are you suggesting the ability to enable/disable auto-population of individual fields?

[major4579]

Thanks. 1.5.1 was submitted to AMO this morning.

Yeah, this was the way I designed it.

Are you suggesting the ability to enable/disable auto-population of individual fields?

Now that I know that this is working as designed, I can anticipate what will happen.

As I said it really isn't affecting my use of PWM so I don't want to make a Feature Request for something I do not need (I'm know you've got plenty of other features to work on!)