PasswordMaker Forums
Miscellaneous => Other => Topic started by: Eric H. Jung on March 25, 2006, 06:57:31 PM
-
Hi,
PasswordMaker for Firefox/Mozilla/Netscape/Flock version 1.5.1 beta 2 has been released and is available here (http://passwordmaker.org/beta.html). I look forward to your feedback.
Thanks,
Eric
-
That fixed the problem with the Custom fields not being auto-populated. PMW 1.5.1.b2 is working fine so far, I will need to "exercise it" over the next couple of days and let you know what I find.
Thanks!
-
Thanks. I look forward to hearing from you so I can get this out the door and start working on new features instead of bug fixing!
-
Oops. I hadn't updated the About box to read "1.5.1 Beta2". It's fixed now. If you downloaded beta2 before now, the About box incorrectly reads "1.5.1 Beta1".
-
Eric,
I've tried accessing most of my frequently used sites and almost everything is working fine with PWM 1.5.1.b2.
In fact here is the only problem/quirk that I've encountered.
whether or not the Automaticaly populate option is checked on the General TAB, any custom fields from the "Auto-Populate" tab are entered.
This really doesn't affect my usage, just seems that the "Auto-Populate" fileds need a "Automatically Populate" option.
The other problem is with drag and drop to re-order the account list. I drag an account within a group and no matter where I drop it, it ends up as the last account in the group list.
-
Thanks. 1.5.1 was submitted to AMO this morning.
whether or not the Automaticaly populate option is checked on the General TAB, any custom fields from the "Auto-Populate" tab are entered.
Yeah, this was the way I designed it.
This really doesn't affect my usage, just seems that the "Auto-Populate" fileds need a "Automatically Populate" option.
Are you suggesting the ability to enable/disable auto-population of individual fields?
-
Thanks. 1.5.1 was submitted to AMO this morning.
Yeah, this was the way I designed it.
Are you suggesting the ability to enable/disable auto-population of individual fields?
Now that I know that this is working as designed, I can anticipate what will happen.
As I said it really isn't affecting my use of PWM so I don't want to make a Feature Request for something I do not need (I'm know you've got plenty of other features to work on!)